| 
CHARLIE
WAS A SEVEN YEAR OLD, male neutered, Siamese cat. He was an
entirely indoor cat and lived together with six other cats
and three dogs. None of the cats were up to date with their
vaccinations but they were wormed regularly with praziquantel
(Drontal Cat; Bayer). Charlie was fed a variety of tinned
cat foods and occasional human food tit bits. He had had no
previous medical problems and was on no medication at the
time of presentation.
History
A
week prior to presentation Charlie had suffered from acute
onset vomiting and diarrhoea. The vomit contained a lot of
fresh blood and the diarrhoea was very watery. Since this
time Charlie had been very depressed and lethargic. He was
almost completely anorexic and his owner was concerned that
he had lost a significant amount of weight. He was drinking
more than usual (polydipsia) and his owner thought that he
was probably urinating a little more than usual as well (polyuria).
During the past week a strange gulping/swallowing behaviour
followed by excessive licking of the lips had also started.
On the day of onset of the clinical signs Charlie's owner
had used an ammonium based carpet cleaner. She felt that Charlie
could have had access to this, but equally so could the other
animals and none of them were showing any clinical signs.
Clinical
examination
On
presentation Charlie was quiet but alert and responsive. He
was in fair body condition, despite the recent weight loss,
weighing 4.25 kg. A mucopurulent discharge was present from
the right eye and his submandibular lymph nodes were moderately
enlarged on both sides. Oral examination was greatly resented,
so examination of the back of the throat was difficult. However,
it was possible to see that Charlie was suffering from severe
dental disease with lots of tartar and associated gingivitis.
The
list of problems included:
Acute
onset vomiting and diarrhoea
Anorexia
and weight loss
Polyuria
and polydipsia
Excessive
licking/swallowing
Gingivitis
Unilateral
ocular discharge
Differential
diagnosis
Due
to the wide variety of clinical signs the differential diagnosis
list was vast. However we tried to narrow this down into two
main categories. Firstly we felt that Charlie was likely to
be suffering from a primary gastrointestinal problem. This
might include dietary indiscretion/hypersensitivity, gastrointestinal
infection or idiopathic (of unknown cause) inflammatory bowel
disease. Secondly Charlie was showing clinical signs of ocular
and oral disease. Upper respiratory tract infections were
high on our list of differentials. Chlamydia (now known as
chlamydophila) is a very common cause of ocular discharge
in cats and feline herpesvirus and calicivirus cause typical
`cat flu' signs. Because we perceived that Charlie had a particularly
sore throat we also considered the possibility of pharygeal
trauma or a foreign body. Lastly, it was also possible that
these signs could simply be caused by the severe dental problems.
Investigations
Blood
was taken for routine haematology, serum biochemistry and
for FIV/FeLV screening. Given the amount of blood present
in the vomit, a coagulation profile was also undertaken to
assess Charlie's blood clotting ability. Pharyngeal and conjunctival
swabs were submitted for isolation of feline herpesvirus,
calicivirus and chlamydophila. A urine sample was submitted
for urinalysis and a faecal sample was taken for parasitology
and bacteriology. A full ophthalmoscopic examination was carried
out in respect of the ocular discharge. Charlie was anaesthetised
for imaging studies. Radiographs were taken of the pharynx,
chest and abdomen and ultrasound scanning of the intestines
was performed. Finally, both upper and lower gastrointestinal
endoscopy was carried out in order to directly visualise the
lining of the intestinal tract. Multiple pinch biopsies were
taken from the stomach, duodenum and colon.
Results
Laboratory
results
Haematology
was remarkably normal, but a mild reduction in lymphocytes
(lymphopenia) was noted. This can sometimes result from viral
infections. Serum biochemistry was again fairly unremarkable.
A moderate increase in creatine kinase was present. This is
an enzyme that is released from muscles and is usually raised
following muscle damage. In cats, however, quite marked elevations
in creatine kinase can be found following periods of anorexia
(not eating). Charlie had hardly eaten anything for a week
so this could well explain this elevation. The blood clotting
times (PT and APTT) were both mildly prolonged. However, no
blood had been noted in his vomit for at least three days
so the significance of this finding was uncertain.
FIV
and FeLV screening tests were negative, as was herpesvirus
and chlamydophila isolation. Feline calicivirus isolation
was positive. Calicivirus infection can often result in cats
developing `sore throats' and this was thought to be the most
likely explanation for Charlie's unusual gulping and swallowing
behaviour. Urine and faecal analysis were both unremarkable.
Ophthalmoscopy
Ophthalmoscopy
confirmed the presence of a left ocular discharge. This was
associated with a unilateral conjunctivitis. No abnormalities
of the right eye were noted.
Diagnostic
imaging
Radiography
of the pharynx, chest and abdomen were all unremarkable, as
was ultrasonography of the intestines. Endoscopy revealed
the gastric mucosa to be grossly normal but the duodenal mucosa
was diffusely reddened. It was also more friable and haemorrhagic
than would be expected in a normal cat. Similar, but less
pronounced, changes were evident throughout the colon.
Histopathology
of the duodenal andcolonic biopsies revealed significant stunting
of the villi with an infiltration of inflammatory cells, predominantly
comprising lymphocytes and plasma cells. This infiltration
was not sufficiently marked for this to be called an `inflammatory
bowel disease' and instead it was classified as an enteropathy
of unknown origin. Histopathology of the gastric biopsies
was unremarkable.
Diagnosis
Charlie
was diagnosed with an unclassified enteropathy. Although coagulation
tests had been mildly abnormal, it was not known whether this
was clinically significant. It was possible that Charlie's
clinical signs had been caused by carpet cleaner ingestion
but there was no firm proof of this. Charlie's calicivirus
infection was likely to be independent of these other problems
and responsible purely for his pharyngeal signs.
Treatment
The
mainstay of treatment was an exclusion diet and we chose to
use Waltham's 'selected protein' diet. Several drugs were
also used in our treatment protocol in order to relieve the
clinical signs. Cyproheptidine (Periactin; Merck, Sharp &
Dohme) was used at a dose rate of 0.5 mg/kg twice daily. This
is an antihistamine drug that can be used to treat allergic
skin disease but in this case was used as an appetite stimulant.
Cimetidine (Tagamet; SmithKline Beecham) is an H2 receptor
blocker which is used to help prevent gastrointestinal ulceration.
This was used at a dose rate of 4 mg/kg twice daily. The antibiotic
metronidazole (Merck generics) was used at 10 mg/kg twice
daily. This was prescribed first to treat any small intestinal
bacterial overgrowth that may have been present and secondly
because it is thought to have immunomodulatory actions which
may be beneficial in inflammatory gut conditions. The unilateral
conjunctivitis was treated using fucithalmic eye drops twice
daily.
Initially
a naso-oesophageal tube was placed to facilitate nutritional
support. These feeding tubes are usually very well tolerated
by cats, but unfortunately not by Charlie! Within 20 minutes
of us placing the tube Charlie had managed to dance violently
around his kennel and remove it. This was probably due to
the fact that his throat was so sore and it was likely that
he could feel the tube rubbing at the back of his pharynx.
Charlie did however require some form of nutritional support
so he was anaesthetised for placement of a percutaneous endoscopically-placed
gastrostomy tube (PEG tube). This tube passes through the
abdominal wall directly into the stomach allowing administration
of both food and drugs. The tube can be easily placed and
removed using endoscopy and does not involve laparotomy or
stitches. While Charlie was anaesthetised dental work including
a scale and polish and several extractions was performed.
This was in case his severe dental disease was contributing
to his anorexia. Post operatively clavulanate potentiated
amoxycillin (Synulox; Pfizer) was introduced into the treatment
regime at a dose rate of 10 mg/kg twice daily. This was to
help prevent any infection at the site of the PEG tube and
also to guard against any spread of systemic infection following
the dental treatment. Because of his sore throat Charlie did
not like taking tablets. Once the PEG tube was in place all
the oral medications were therefore given via the tube rather
than by mouth.
PEG
tube feeding
The
first thing we needed to do was to calculate how much food
Charlie would require each day. In order to do this we first
calculated his resting energy requirement (RER). In cats weighing
more than 2 kg this can be estimated using the following equation:
RER(kcal/day)
= 40 x bodyweight (kg)
Charlie's
bodyweight was 4.25 kg and his resting energy requirement
was therefore 170 kcal/day (40 x 4.25). An illness factor
can also be introduced which involves multiplying this basic
energy requirement by a factor of between 1.2 and 1.6. The
specific value used depends upon the type of illness the cat
has and how energy consuming that particular disease is. In
Charlie's case an illness factor was not used because we were
more concerned about the possibility of overfeeding, which
can also lead to problems.
The
selected protein diet that we had chosen for Charlie contained
850 kcal of energy per kilogram of food. The amount of food
required per day is calculated using the following equation:
Energy content of diet(kcal/kg)
Food
requirement (g) = ----------------------------------
Energy requirement
of patient(kcal)
Charlie
therefore needed 200g of food per day (850 ÷ 170) in
order to supply his energy requirements.
PEG
tube feeding regime
- 50ml/kg/day
(200ml)
- Day 2: 1/3 food requirement
- 67g (4
meals of 17g)
- Day 3: 2/3 food requirement
- 133g (4
meals of 33g)
- Day 4: total food requirement
- 200g (4
meals of 50g)
|
Figure1:
PEG feeding regime |
For
the first 24 hours following tube placement only water was
given in order to give the PEG tube wound time to heal over
a little. After this time the amount of food given was gradually
increased until the full requirement was reached on day 4
(fig 1). The food that we had chosen was a fairly solid food
and could not be syringed down the tube straight from the
tin. Instead it needed to be diluted with water and liquidised
to make it runny. Before feeding any diet it is important
to make sure it is warmed to room temperature (do not use
it straight from the fridge!). An empty syringe was used to
suck back on Charlie's PEG tube to check that the previous
meal was not still sitting in the stomach. Once this had been
done the food was slowly instilled into the stomach. When
all the food had been given the tube was flushed with enough
water to ensure that it didn't block with any residual food.
This usually required around 7 ml of water.
It
is very important to monitor the PEG tube wound carefully
for any sign of infection. At least once daily all of Charlie's
dressings were removed and the wound gently washed. A light
dressing usually consisting of a surgical swab held in place
by an adhesive primipore pad was then replaced. The PEG tube
itself was secured using a light elasticated tubular sleeve
placed around the abdomen.
Outcome
Charlie
remained hospitalised for 10 days after the tube placement,
but during this time he made very little improvement. His
owners were keen to have him home and so he was discharged
to continue all his medications and PEG tube feeding at home.
Once home he made a gradual improvement. Initially his demeanour
improved and he was far brighter and showing much greater
interest in his surroundings. Unfortunately his appetite remained
very variable. Eventually however, after eight weeks of perseverance,
his appetite had almost returned to normal. The PEG tube was
maintained for a further two weeks but was then removed. All
of the medications were stopped at this time.
It
is now almost eight months since Charlie was first presented
and as yet he has had no further problems. This case illustrates
very well how nutritional support can play an integral role
in the treatment of many patients. Whether it be syringe feeding,
nasooesophageal tubes, PEG tubes or even enterotomy tubes,
nutrition should always be an important consideration in the
treatment of any anorexic cat. |